Categories
News

Trump Finds New Leverage Against China – He Could Use Trillions In Century

President Trump is determined to hold China responsible for its role in the global pandemic. And he might have a new option.

China doesn’t seem all too eager to repay us for all that we’ve lost. It will take some serious negotiating to get China to admit their faults.

But it looks like Trump doesn’t have to go very far to find leverage. Because there’s a great big one right nearby.

The Lewisburg, Tennessee-based American Bondholder Foundation holds $1.6 trillion of century-old Chinese debt, including interest, dating to before the founding of the communist People’s Republic of China, that it wants the administration’s help in redeeming. There is an estimated $6 trillion or more of the debt outstanding worldwide.

Now, this is news! A Tennessee-based firm apparently holds $1.6 trillion of century-old Chinese debt.

The bonds were sold back when the Republic of China was in power, after they ousted the imperial government. When the communist government took over, ROC fled to Taiwan.

Because China considers Taiwan a part of their country, they are responsible for this debt.

How interesting! Funny how they’ve been trying to ignore this gold-backed debt for over 100 years.

Plenty of people talk about how much debt the world owes China. Yet there is an estimated $6 trillion debt owed by China around the world.

How much do you want to bet China won’t even recognize this debt?

They don’t have a leg to stand on, though. Either they have to admit they owe this money or acknowledge Taiwan isn’t a part of their country.

Talk about a rock and a hard place!

Chairwoman of the American Bondholder Foundation claims Trump promised to “do this deal.” While we don’t have official confirmation from the White House, don’t be surprised if this comes up soon.

You better believe Trump will be knocking on China’s door very soon. He will most likely use whatever arsenal is at his disposal to get China to pay.

This $1 trillion debt is a good place to start!

Categories
News

Donald And Melania Just Honored America’s Most Forgotten Heroes – It Was A Night To Remember

The First Family took patriotism to a new level with their White House Gala for America’s under-appreciated heroes.

These people work tirelessly to make our communities great. Often, they do it silently, where nobody notices their contribution.

But our White House has and they threw them a gala event in thanks.

A wonderful tribute to our military mothers & spouses at the @WhiteHouse today. Thank you to all who came to celebrate & to the United States Army Chorus for an amazing performance!

Wow – that is so moving. Thank you for honoring, President and First Lady!

They celebrated the event with a performance from the United States Army Chorus.

It was such a special night to thank those who support our brave men and women in the Armed Forces. These mothers and wives give up a lot so that our nation is safe.

Imagine what a mom goes through, saying goodbye to their sons and daughters who join the military. Yet day in and day out, they continue to support their families at home, as their children are fighting the good fight.

The same goes for wives and spouses of our soldiers. They keep the home fires burning as their loved ones are stationed overseas.

They give up much so that we are free. Yet, they are rarely acknowledged or thanked.

President Trump and Melania changed all that with this special night. It is further proof that the First Family will do everything they can to honor Americans. Especially those who give their all.

Categories
News

Lindsey Graham Turns On President Trump – Says Senate Obamagate Probe Will Not Investigate Barack Obama

President Trump has been demanding a full investigation into what he is dubbing, “Obamagate.” New evidence seems to suggest the former president was behind the plan to set up Michael Flynn.

Senate Republicans responded to this new evidence by saying they would call former officials in to testify. That would be a big step toward uncovering the truth.

But, suddenly, Sen. Lindsey Graham reversed course and made what some would consider a cowardly move.

From Politico:

“I’m not anticipating calling President Obama,” said Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), whose panel is investigating the origins of the 2016 Russia investigation, even as he vowed to bring in former senior Obama administration officials as witnesses. Those ex-officials include former FBI Director James Comey and former acting Attorney General Sally Yates.

Oh, really, Graham? “I’m too scared to question President Obama,” Graham seems to say, whimpering through his lips.

We have a document that seems to show Obama was in on this! Did he order all this? We don’t know. But that’s the point! We need to find out.

Even Sally Yates admitted surprise to learn that Obama knew the FBI was wiretapping Flynn. He discussed their investigation against Flynn.

If Graham is so eager to question Yates, Comey, and others—why not Obama?

Does Graham really think it’s unnecessary? Or is he too scared to confront the former president?

Nixon seemed to think presidents should be immune to scrutiny. Didn’t work out too well for him. But is Obama getting special treatment Nixon was denied?

Will our Republican leaders chicken out, treating Obama with the same kid gloves as the liberal media?

Naturally, Trump is not afraid to call out Barry:

Many believe Donald Trump and his administration were unfairly treated by the deep state. Flynn especially seems to have been railroaded.

Shouldn’t the people behind it be held accountable?

And since Obama may have been involved, why shouldn’t he answer a few simple questions?

In recent years, Lindsey Graham has gotten bolder when confronting the D.C. swamp. He roared like a lion to defend Brett Kavanaugh against the left’s scheme.

So, why won’t he demand Obama answer a few questions?

Categories
News

Trump Cracks Open New ‘Obamagate’ – Accuses Barack Obama Of Involvement With Flynn, Undermining His Presidency

Now that the DOJ dropped Michael Flynn’s case, more documents are revealing what went on behind the scenes.

And it doesn’t look good for Obama-era officials… or even Obama himself.

More and more details are suggesting Obama was up to something. President Trump himself called his predecessor out hard on Twitter:

OBAMAGATE makes Watergate look small time!
From Fox News:

President Trump on Sunday intensified his criticism of former President Obama by tying him to the Michael Flynn investigation…

Trump later tweeted, “OBAMAGATE,” indicating that he believes that Obama worked to undermine his presidency.

Woah. As usual, President Trump doesn’t mince words when he called out Obama’s possible involvement in Flynn’s investigation.

A newly released document revealed Obama was aware of the wiretapping of Flynn’s phone calls. That led to Flynn’s questioning and charges.

All that was connected to the FBI’s investigation into Russia—which many believe to have been a hunt against Trump.

It appears Trump is pointing his finger directly at Obama. Former deputy attorney general revealed that Obama knew about Flynn’s wiretapping.

Does that mean Obama was also in the know on Comey’s Russian case? Did Obama know about the phony dossier that was used to secure a FISA warrant against Trump’s campaign staffer?

Did Obama know that James Comey said he wasn’t investigating Trump, when evidence suggests that was his plan all along?

Trump seems to think so. And in fact, by calling it “Obamagate,” it appears Trump is saying Obama was behind it all.

That’s the biggest question that needs to be answered. More and more evidence suggests the deep state hatched these investigations to take down the president.

Does that mean Obama not only knew about all this… but was behind it? Or at the very least, in agreement?

It’s either that or he was completely unaware of major investigations by his own DOJ. Which is more possible?

Categories
News

Rush Limbaugh Makes Biden Prediction – Says ‘Something’s Gonna Happen’ And Joe Will Vanish From Ballot

As time goes on, many Americans have speculated about Joe Biden’s “electability.”

Democrats were worried about him, before the Tara Reade allegations. Now, it seems many are worrying if he can stand up against a candidate like Donald Trump.

Now, Rush Limbaugh, one of conservative America’s top voices is making a bold prediction about Sleepy Joe.

From Washington Examiner:

Conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh predicted that presumptive Democratic nominee Joe Biden will essentially disappear from November’s election ticket…

“Something’s gonna happen. They can’t possibly, they can’t possibly go into the race with the guy on the ticket. He couldn’t withstand one debate with Trump if there were any debates.”

Now, this is something worth paying attention to. Radio host and conservative voice Rush Limbaugh predicted Joe Biden would not be on November’s ticket.

He claimed, “something gonna happen.” He doesn’t explicitly state what, but his claim suggests the Democrats will try to move to replace Joe.

Limbaugh points to Biden’s possible performance against Trump in debates. Some have suspected the left will try to cancel the debates, claiming the virus.

But if they were able to hold a Biden-Sanders debate in March, they can do the same in the late summer.

Limbaugh also talked about the hole liberals dug themselves in with the #MeToo movement. They said we had to “believe all women.”

Now? They either have to believe Tara Reade or defend a man who might have done something very bad.

The radio host said Democrats are “all tied in knots and pretzels” over Joe. He said they “have to find a way to get him off the ticket.”

His prediction, however, is very ominous. How can the left properly remove a man who already won so many delegates?

How do they get rid of him? Limbaugh’s “somethings gonna happen” statement suggests drastic action might be taken.

Biden might be forced to step down. Or the DNC will (once again) rewrite their own nomination rules.

But will anything they do work, without outraging Democrat voters? And how will that impact whoever they get on the November ticket?

Categories
News

Lindsey Graham Turns On President Trump – Says Senate Obamagate Probe Will Not Investigate Barack Obama

President Trump has been demanding a full investigation into what he is dubbing, “Obamagate.” New evidence seems to suggest the former president was behind the plan to set up Michael Flynn.

Senate Republicans responded to this new evidence by saying they would call former officials in to testify. That would be a big step toward uncovering the truth.

But, suddenly, Sen. Lindsey Graham reversed course and made what some would consider a cowardly move.

From Politico:

“I’m not anticipating calling President Obama,” said Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), whose panel is investigating the origins of the 2016 Russia investigation, even as he vowed to bring in former senior Obama administration officials as witnesses. Those ex-officials include former FBI Director James Comey and former acting Attorney General Sally Yates.

Oh, really, Graham? “I’m too scared to question President Obama,” Graham seems to say, whimpering through his lips.

We have a document that seems to show Obama was in on this! Did he order all this? We don’t know. But that’s the point! We need to find out.

Even Sally Yates admitted surprise to learn that Obama knew the FBI was wiretapping Flynn. He discussed their investigation against Flynn.

If Graham is so eager to question Yates, Comey, and others—why not Obama?

Does Graham really think it’s unnecessary? Or is he too scared to confront the former president?

Nixon seemed to think presidents should be immune to scrutiny. Didn’t work out too well for him. But is Obama getting special treatment Nixon was denied?

Many believe Donald Trump and his administration were unfairly treated by the deep state. Flynn especially seems to have been railroaded.

Shouldn’t the people behind it be held accountable?

And since Obama may have been involved, why shouldn’t he answer a few simple questions?

In recent years, Lindsey Graham has gotten bolder when confronting the D.C. swamp. He roared like a lion to defend Brett Kavanaugh against the left’s scheme.

So, why won’t he demand Obama answer a few questions?

Categories
News

CNN reporter says American women should wear an Islamic veil to show respect and solidarity with Islam and Muslims .

CNN соrrеѕроndеnt ѕауѕ Amеrісаn lаdіеѕ ѕhоuld wеаr аn Iѕlаmіс сlоаk tо dеmоnѕtrаtе rеgаrd and ѕоlіdаrіtу wіth Iѕlаm аnd Muѕlіmѕ. Thе burkа ѕуmbоlіzеѕ аbuѕе оf lаdіеѕ undеr Shаrіа lаw оf Iѕlаm.
I’vе bееn ѕtаtіng fоr ԛuіtе a lоng time, lіbеrаlѕ wіll begin сhаngіng оvеr tо Iѕlаm аftеr a ѕhоrt tіmе. Iѕ іt truе thаt іt іѕn’t fаѕсіnаtіng hоw іt’ѕ Muѕlіmѕ individuals еvеrуwhеrе thrоughоut thе wоrld аnd іn thе US, уеt bу оnе mеаnѕ оr аnоthеr іt’ѕ Muѕlіmѕ whо аrе frіghtful аnd аrе thе casualties?
It’ѕ muсh thе ѕаmе аѕ Hіllаrу ѕuрроrtеrѕ bеіng dерісtеd аѕ “drеаdful” whеn аll thе vісіоuѕnеѕѕ аnd аnаrсhу іѕ оrіgіnаtіng frоm Hіllаrу ѕuрроrtеrѕ. Wе’rе lіvіng іn a Twіlіght Zоnе.
CNN соrrеѕроndеnt ѕауѕ Amеrісаn lаdіеѕ ѕhоuld wеаr аn Iѕlаmіс сlоаk tо dеmоnѕtrаtе rеgаrd and ѕоlіdаrіtу wіth Iѕlаm аnd Muѕlіmѕ. Thе burkа ѕуmbоlіzеѕ аbuѕе оf lаdіеѕ undеr Shаrіа lаw оf Iѕlаm.
I’vе bееn ѕtаtіng fоr ԛuіtе a lоng time, lіbеrаlѕ wіll begin сhаngіng оvеr tо Iѕlаm аftеr a ѕhоrt tіmе. Iѕ іt truе thаt іt іѕn’t fаѕсіnаtіng hоw іt’ѕ Muѕlіmѕ individuals еvеrуwhеrе thrоughоut thе wоrld аnd іn thе US, уеt bу оnе mеаnѕ оr аnоthеr іt’ѕ Muѕlіmѕ whо аrе frіghtful аnd аrе thе casualties?
It’ѕ muсh thе ѕаmе аѕ Hіllаrу ѕuрроrtеrѕ bеіng dерісtеd аѕ “drеаdful” whеn аll thе vісіоuѕnеѕѕ аnd аnаrсhу іѕ оrіgіnаtіng frоm Hіllаrу ѕuрроrtеrѕ. Wе’rе lіvіng іn a Twіlіght Zоnе.

Categories
News

Hours After Clinton Judge Blocks Flynn Dismissal – Judge Faces Ethics Complaint Over Possible Violation

It looked like Michael Flynn was cleared of charges, but not so fast! Democrats are trying to pull one last stunt to doom the man.

And it involves a Clinton-appointed judge.

Emmet Sullivan slammed the breaks on the attorney general’s decision. And he’s making a very bizarre decision.

From The Hill:

On Tuesday evening, Sullivan pulled a surprise, announcing in a court filing that he would allow interested parties to weigh in on the case with amicus briefs, an unusual move for a criminal prosecution, and enter a scheduling order “at the appropriate time.”

Huh? This Democrat-appointed judge is halting the AG’s dropping of the charges in order to hear from third parties.

This is not supposed to happen for a criminal case. Either a person is innocent or guilty. That’s it.

If the prosecutors drop the charges, the case should be closed. For this judge to bring in “interested parties” to weigh in on the case appears partisan.

Why should other people chime in on this situation?

It seems they think they can bend the rule of law by welcoming outside voices—to pollute the cause of justice.

From Twitter:

Judge Sullivan, who denied leave to file amicus briefs when he knew third parties would have spoken favorably of Flynn, now solicits briefs critical of Flynn. This is a violation of the judicial oath and applicable ethical rules. We will be filing a complaint against Sullivan.

Uh-oh! It looks like Judge Sullivan may have deliberately prevented third parties from speaking, when they would have said something favorable of Flynn.

But when groups show up ready to bash the man, Sullivan is all for it. Even as the DOJ drops the entire case.

Hmm… sound like a conflict of interest to you? According to Mike Cernovich, this is a violation of Sullivan’s judicial oath and ethical rules.

He’s not sitting on the sidelines either. Cernovich announced he is filing a complaint against Sullivan. And he might not be the only one.

Categories
News

Democrat Congressman Introduces H.R. 6666 – A Fitting Number For A Bill That Lets Government Track Citizens

Just when you thought Democrats were as far left as they could go, they find more room. Rep. Bobby Rush from Illinois has a “great” new idea for battling the virus.

He’s named the bill “6666” awfully close to an infamous number, huh? But it gets worse.

What he plans to do is downright Soviet, and a little devilish.

From the Washington Times:

According to H.R. 6666’s text: The taxpayer funds will be used to “trace and monitor the contacts of infected individuals, and to support the quarantine of such contacts, through mobile health units and, as necessary … at [citizens’] residences.”

Rush’s new bill, numbered 6666, will use tax dollars to monitor Americans infected with the disease.

It appears this bill would empower the federal government to demand you take a test. If you’re positive, they will then have the power to monitor your movements and force you to quarantine.

Pretty drastic measures for a disease with a low death rate and readily available treatments.

Many are asking a reasonable question: how will the government enforce such a measure?

Will they force their way into our homes? Demand we take a test before we can go back to work?

How will they “monitor” us (a direct violation of our rights)? Through our phones? Will they spy on our GPS apps?

What will they do if they catch us outside of quarantine? Hammer our doors shut like they did in China?

This bill, beyond its ominous name, raises too many questions. The fact that a Democrat thinks this is an appropriate move to battle a flu-like disease is chilling.

I guess he’s been reading Saul Alinsky’s book. Or Stalin’s.

Categories
News

Intelligence Chief Puts Schiff on Notice by Revealing ‘Russia Collusion’ Transcripts Are Ready for Release

What exactly is Adam Schiff keeping so secret?
The California congressman and chairman of the House Intelligence Committee is facing increasing calls to release transcripts of interviews the committee conducted as part of its probe into “Russian collusion,” but the latest twist might be taking the matter out of his hands.
In a letter to Schiff publicized Wednesday by the Washington Examiner, acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell informed the representative that the transcripts are ready for release – and tacitly threatened to release them on his own.
The 53 transcripts involve the questionings of some of the biggest names in the Trump administration who were dragged into the Democrats’ obsession with blaming Russia for Donald Trump’s historic upset of Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election.

On the Trump side, they include Donald Trump Jr., the president’s eldest son, Hope Hicks, the Trump campaign aide who has returned to the White House, and Roger Stone, the Trump ally and veteran Republican activist. Stone is currently free on bail while appealing a three-year sentence conviction for lying to Congress and witness tampering in connection with the “collusion” investigation, according to the Washington Examiner.
The Trump opponents’ side includes former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, who was fired for lying to FBI agents, and former Obama White House National Security Advisor Susan Rice.
While the contents of the transcripts are still sealed, it’s an excellent chance that information from insiders like that will shed much-needed light on the investigation Democrats used to try to trip up the Trump administration during its first years.
For most Americans, the “Russia collusion” theory died a whimpering death with the release of special counsel Robert Mueller’s report in April 2019 that found no collusion or obstruction of justice on the president’s part.
It was buried by a bewildered Mueller’s disastrous appearance on Capitol Hill in July, which only brought up questions about who was actually running the attempt to get rid of Trump.
In September of 2018, nine months before the Mueller report was published, the House Intelligence Committee voted to make the interviews public after they had been screened by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence for classified information. (The committee was under Republican control at the time, but the vote was unanimous.)
The security screening has long since completed, yet Schiff still refuses to let normal Americans know what his committee learned.
In the letter reported Wednesday by the Washington Examiner’s Byron York, Grenell wrote that it’s time for that to change.
“I urge you to honor your previous public statements, and your committee’s unanimous vote on this matter, to release all 53 cleared transcripts to Members of Congress and the American public as soon as possible,” Grenell wrote, according to York.
Then he lowered the boom.
“I am also willing to release the transcripts directly from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, as to ensure we comply with the unanimous and bipartisan vote to release the transcripts,” he wrote.
It’s important to note the wording. Grenell writes only that he is “willing” to release the transcripts, not that he will release the transcripts.
As commentator Ed Morrissey wrote at HotAir, it’s not clear that Grenell has that authority – his office was only vetting the material for classified information.
But there’s no question that he put Schiff on notice that the material belongs in the public eye — and the clock is ticking.
It’s another, very loud voice added to the chorus that’s been clamoring for the interviews to be released in recent days.